CAT 906 vs Bobcat L65 Compact Wheel Loaders
Compare the CAT 906 and Bobcat L65 compact wheel loaders to determine which model offers superior performance, features, and value. This side-by-side comparison highlights engine power, operating weight, and bucket capacity to help you choose the best compact wheel loader for your property or small construction projects.
The CAT 906 is a compact wheel loader powered by a 74.7-hp diesel engine. It offers an operating weight of 12,628 lbs and bucket capacities ranging from 1.0 to 2.0 cubic yards. The machine features a compact design, allowing it to work efficiently in confined spaces.
The Bobcat L65 is a compact wheel loader equipped with a 55-hp diesel engine. It has an operating weight of 9,944 lbs and bucket capacities ranging from 0.86 to 1.3 cubic yards. The L65’s design enables it to operate effectively in tight areas while providing enhanced stability.
CAT 906 Pros:
Higher engine horsepower (74.7 hp) for improved performance
Greater operating weight enhances stability during operation
Larger bucket capacity for increased material handling efficiency
Advanced hydraulic system for improved performance
CAT 906 Cons:
Heavier weight may impact transportability
Larger size may limit access in extremely narrow spaces
Potentially higher cost due to additional features
Increased fuel consumption
Bobcat L65 Pros:
Lighter weight for easier transport
Narrower width for superior accessibility
Optional advanced comfort features
Standard auxiliary hydraulics for attachments
Bobcat L65 Cons:
Lower engine horsepower compared to CAT 906
Smaller bucket capacity may limit material handling efficiency
Lower operating weight may affect stability
Limited availability of certain optional upgrades
Bobcat vs. CAT 906:
The CAT 906 offers higher horsepower, greater operating weight, and larger bucket capacity, making it suitable for users prioritizing power and performance. However, it may be less maneuverable in tight spaces and more challenging to transport. The Bobcat L65 stands out with its lighter weight, narrower width, and optional comfort features, making it a better option for projects requiring enhanced accessibility and operator convenience.